Performance Details

Department of Labor and Workforce Development - Labor Standards and Safety

• Return to Departments
• Labor Standards and Safety website

Mission

Ensure safe and legal working conditions.

Core Services

• Occupational safety and health, law enforcement, training, and consultation.
• Electrical and mechanical code compliance inspection and training.
• Wage and child labor law enforcement and training.

Mission Results	Core Services
A: Eliminate workplace fatalities and worker lost time injuries and illnesses caused by circumstances that are under Alaska Occupational Safety and Health (AKOSH) jurisdiction.  Details > TARGET #1: Reduce workplace fatalities in Alaska Occupational Safety and Health jurisdiction. TARGET #2: 3% percent reduction in the five-year moving average rate of workplace fatalities per 100,000 employees. TARGET #3: 2% percent per year reduction in the rate of workplace lost time injuries and illnesses per 100 employees. TARGET #4: 3% reduction per year in lost time injuries and illnesses per 100 employees in the construction, healthcare, transportation, and seafood processing industries.	A1: Occupational safety and health, law enforcement, training, and consultation.  Details > TARGET #1: Increase the number of Voluntary Protection Program and Safety & Health Achievement Recognition Program sites in Alaska.
Mission Results	Core Services
B: Reduce hazards to life and property posed by unsafe boilers/pressure vessels, plumbing, and electrical work and elevators within Mechanical Inspection's jurisdiction.  Details > TARGET #1: No loss of life or property caused by unsafe boilers/pressure vessels, plumbing, and electrical work and elevators.	B1: Electrical and mechanical code compliance inspection and training.  Details > TARGET #1: Inspect 90 percent of boilers and pressure vessels timely. TARGET #2: Conduct 900 electrical code inspections per year. TARGET #3: Conduct 800 plumbing code inspections per year. TARGET #4: Inspect 90 percent of elevators and escalators timely. TARGET #5: Inspect 90% of Boiler vessel units timely
Mission Results	Core Services
C: More Alaska residents hired and lawfully compensated.  Details >	C1: Wage and child labor law enforcement and training.  Details > TARGET #1: Maintain average wage claim resolution time to six months or less. TARGET #2: Provide Wage and Hour briefings to employers

Performance Detail

Target #1: Reduce workplace fatalities in Alaska Occupational Safety and Health jurisdiction. Methodology: The number of workplace fatalities is calculated using fatality reports submitted to AKOSH. Number of Workplace Fatalities in Alaska Occupational Safety and Health Jurisdiction Year Fatalities Prior Five-Year Average 2019 3 3 2018 4 3.0 2017 4 2.8 2016 2 4.2 2015 2 5.2 2014 3 5.5 2013 4 5.2 2012 3 5.5 2011 9 5 2010 7 5.4 2009 5 3.6 Analysis of results and challenges: The number of workplace fatalities by fiscal year is calculated using fatality reports submitted within the jurisdiction of the Alaska Occupational Safety and Health Section (AKOSH). AKOSH works to reduce workplace fatalities through consultation and enforcement inspections; by targeting industries with high fatality rates; and eliminating the most prevalent causes of fatalities. Due to the relatively small number of workplace fatalities in AKOSH jurisdiction and annual fluctuations, it is more meaningful to view the program’s success as an average for the previous five year period. Just five years ago in FY2014 the five-year average was 5.5 fatalities per year in AKOSH jurisdiction. The FY2019 five year average has been reduced by nearly 50 percent, to 3.0 fatalities per year. As many of AKOSH's promotion, consultation, and training efforts affect industries beyond AKOSH's enforcement jurisdiction, it is useful to evaluate overall workplace fatality numbers in Alaska. Unfortunately, the only recognized source for this data is the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics and the data is generally two years behind. The statewide number of fatalities in all jurisdictions was 33 in CY2017. For more information go to: https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/tgs/2017/iiffw02.htm Related links:    • OSHA Jurisdiction    • Alaska Workplace Fatality Data    • Alaska Labor Statistics

Target #2: 3% percent reduction in the five-year moving average rate of workplace fatalities per 100,000 employees. Methodology: The workplace fatality rate per 100,000 employees is calculated by dividing the number of workplace fatalities during the year by the average number of workers employed and then multiplying the result by 100,000. This statistic is calculated using workplace fatality reports submitted to the Alaska Occupational Safety and Health section and employment statistics maintained by the department's Labor Market Information section. Five-Year Average Rate of Workplace Fatalities per 100,000 Employees Fiscal Year Yearly Rate Five-Year Average Five-Year Avg. % Change FY 2019 3 .9 0% FY 2018 1.22 .90 0% FY 2017 1.21 .90 +7% FY 2016 .59 .84 -34% FY 2015 0.59 1.27 -17% FY 2014 0.89 1.51 -9.0% FY 2013 1.20 1.66 12.1% FY 2012 .91 1.48 -8.1% FY 2011 2.74 1.61 +10.3% FY 2010 1.9 1.46 +9% FY 2009 1.55 1.34 +30% Analysis of results and challenges: This statistic is calculated using workplace fatality reports submitted to the Alaska Occupational Safety and Health (AKOSH) section and employment statistics maintained by the department's Labor Market Information section. Even though AKOSH was not able to achieve the three percent reduction target for FY2018 in the workplace fatality five-year average, the five-year average rate remained the same. In FY2018, there was an average of 327,683 employees and four fatalities, resulting in a 1.22 fatality rate. AKOSH will continue to work to reduce workplace fatalities through a combination of consultation and enforcement activities targeted on eliminating the most prevalent causes of fatalities in industries with high fatality rates. Related links:    • Workplace Fatality Statistics

Target #3: 2% percent per year reduction in the rate of workplace lost time injuries and illnesses per 100 employees. Methodology: Prior to FY2011 this rate was calculated as of September 30, but this delayed budget performance reporting until November. To eliminate this delay, as of FY2011, rates are calculated for the state fiscal year as of June 30. Analysis of results and challenges: Since FY2010, the Alaska Occupational Safety and Health (AKOSH) program has reduced the workplace illness and injury rate by 31 percent by targeting consultation and enforcement efforts on the causes of illnesses and injuries in industries and employers with high incident rates. This effort has resulted in an ongoing reduction in rates. The five-year strategic plan that began in FY2019 concentrates on the construction, healthcare and seafood processing industries that have relatively high rates. Related links:    • OSHA jurisdiction    • Alaska nonfatal injury and illness statistics

Target #4: 3% reduction per year in lost time injuries and illnesses per 100 employees in the construction, healthcare, transportation, and seafood processing industries. Methodology: Rates are calculated based on Workers' Compensation reports of lost work incidents each year divided by the average annual number of employees in each industry category according to data produced by the Department of Labor and Workforce Development's Research and Analysis Section (non-seasonally adjusted). Each result is multiplied by 100 employees to establish the lost time rate per 100 employees in each industry. AKOSH obtains illness and injury data from Workers’ Compensation insurance claims data and employment statistics maintained by the department’s Research and Analysis section Note: On 11/3/16, published data for FY2014 and FY2015 was updated with more accurate numbers. Previous data was affected by a software migration that occurred in July of 2013. Workers’ Compensation moved to a new system and this resulted in inaccurate queries. Also, around that time the data collection process moved from paper to electronic. Workplace Lost Time Injuries and Illnesses Rate per 100 Employees in Construction, Healthcare, Transportation and Seafood Processing Industries Fiscal Year Trans. Rate Const. Rate Seafood Rate Healthcare rate FY 2019 1.2 -7.69% 3.88% 0.97% FY 2018 1.10% 1.30 +13.04% 4.03% FY 2017 1.15% 1.15 -23.84% 3.35% FY 2016 1.12% 1.51 3.90% FY 2015 1.31% 2.05% 3.44% FY 2014 1.55% 1.90% 4.24% FY 2013 1.56% 1.50% 3.36% FY 2012 2.29% 1.90% 3.13% FY 2011 1.81% 1.85% 3.79% FY 2010 1.82% 1.80% 2.85% FY 2009 2.10% 2.12% 3.07% Analysis of results and challenges: Alaska Occupational Safety and Health (AKOSH) works to reduce illnesses and injuries by targeting consultation and enforcement efforts on the causes of lost workday illnesses and injuries in high hazard industries. In FY2019, AKOSH has redirected efforts from transportation towards the healthcare industry to reduce its high hazard rate and to prevent occupational fatalities, injuries, and illnesses among Alaskan workers. FY2019 is the base year for the healthcare industry. In FY2019 AKOSH achieved a three percent reduction in the construction and seafood processing industries. AKOSH will continue to strive to achieve the overall downward trend in all tracked industries. Related links:    • Alaska nonfatal injury and illness statistics

Target #1: Increase the number of Voluntary Protection Program and Safety & Health Achievement Recognition Program sites in Alaska. Number of Voluntary Protection Program and Safety & Health Achievement Recognition Program Sites in Alaska Fiscal Year VPP Sites SHARP Sites Total Sites %Change FY 2019 10 +11.11% 1 -90.91% 11 -45% -45% FY 2018 9 0% 11 0% 20 0% 0 FY 2017 9 -10% 11 -15.38% 20 -13.04% -13% FY 2016 10 -9.09% 13 -13.33% 23 -11.54% -12% FY 2015 11 0% 15 -6.25% 26 -3.7% -4% FY 2014 11 -8.33% 16 +33.33% 27 +12.5% 12% FY 2013 12 0% 12 -40% 24 -25% -25% FY 2012 12 -25% 20 0% 32 -11.11% -11% FY 2011 16 0% 20 +17.65% 36 +9.09% 9% FY 2010 16 +6.67% 17 +13.33% 33 +10% 9% FY 2009 15 +15.38% 15 -6.25% 30 +3.45% 3% Analysis of results and challenges: The Safety & Health Achievement Recognition Program (SHARP) targets smaller employers with less than 250 employees at a site and less than 500 employees total. These smaller employers require additional assistance to establish the safety and health protocols and performance to participate in SHARP. The program provides an employer with the knowledge and motivation to take control of safety and health performance. In 2019, an audit revealed that 10 of the 11 SHARP sites had failed to maintain qualifications due to turnover of the SHARP Coordinator position and missed deadline to renew for the program. The AKOSH section is refocusing efforts on assisting small employers and promoting participation in SHARP. In August 2019 5 new SHARP sites were admitted into the program and 3 more are in process of being renewed. The Voluntary Protection Program (VPP) is not limited by the number of employees the company has before applying for participation in the program; however, due to amount of time needed to submit an application and preparation time for meeting qualifications for the program, Alaska has relatively few employers large enough to apply or to meet the necessary criteria. Efforts to improve promoting the benefits of the cooperative programs to businesses will increase. Consultants will work in partnership with businesses to assist with the development, implementation and maintenance of occupational safety and health programs and performance necessary to meet VPP and SHARP participation standards. Through government-industry partnerships in programs like VPP and SHARP, AKOSH will demonstrate the value of outstanding safety and health performance on profitability and workforce productivity. Related links:    • AKOSH VPP & SHARP Information    • VPPPA - (Membership Organization Site)

Target #1: No loss of life or property caused by unsafe boilers/pressure vessels, plumbing, and electrical work and elevators. Methodology: Mechanical Inspection did not receive any reports of these occurrences. Analysis of results and challenges: Mechanical Inspection tracks the specific number of incidents causing loss of life or property as a result of unsafe boilers or pressure vessels, plumbing and electrical work and elevators. Mechanical Inspection will strive to inspect boilers, pressure vessels, and elevators by the inspection due date and eliminate code violations. Mechanical Inspection will eliminate hazards to life and property by inspecting electrical and plumbing work and pursue correction of any code or licensing violations identified. It is extremely important to maintain a zero incident rate as a single incident could be catastrophic. Related links:    • Mechanical Inspection Jurisdiction    • National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors

Target #1: Inspect 90 percent of boilers and pressure vessels timely. Methodology: Boiler and pressure vessels inspections are tracked through the Mechanical Inspection's database. These results represent the number of inspections that came due for all objects in FY2019 as a percentage of the total number of inspections. Percent of Timely Boiler and Pressure Vessels Inspections Fiscal Year Total Inspections Due # Inspections Completed % Inspected Timely FY 2019 12,545 11,521 91.84% FY 2018 11,976 10,853 90.95% FY 2017 13,330 11,993 89.96% FY 2016 12,227 10,943 89.50% FY 2015 12,217 10,735 88.00% FY 2014 12,953 11,114 86.00% FY 2013 11,194 10,177 90.91% FY 2012 13,849 12,223 88.26% FY 2011 11,859 10,888 91.81% FY 2010 12,494 11,481 91.89% FY 2009 11,033 9,774 88.59% Analysis of results and challenges: Timely inspections are important for identifying and correcting code deficiencies in boilers and pressure vessels subject to inspections. Some regional or community inspections may be delayed due to extreme travel costs or other considerations until a number of objects in that region or community become due for inspection. Despite turnover, Mechanical Inspection was able to exceed the target of 90 percent in FY2019.

Target #2: Conduct 900 electrical code inspections per year. Methodology: Mechanical Inspection staff performs inspections and tracks the number performed. These results represent the number of inspections completed as a percentage of the number of inspections due. Analysis of results and challenges: The total number of inspections due is based on a full staff of three electrical inspectors who conduct random field inspections. Limited travel funds also directly impact our delivery of this service.

Target #3: Conduct 800 plumbing code inspections per year. Methodology: Mechanical Inspection staff performs inspections and tracks the number performed. These results represent the number of inspections completed as a percentage of the number of inspections due. Analysis of results and challenges: The total number of inspections due is based on a staff of three full-time plumbing inspectors who conduct random field inspections. The section was able to exceed its inspection goal for the first time in FY2019 due to increased inspection emphasis by program staff. Travel costs continue to impact Mechanical Inspection’s ability to provide complete inspection coverage statewide.

Target #4: Inspect 90 percent of elevators and escalators timely. Methodology: Elevator inspections are tracked through the Mechanical Inspections database on a two-year inspection cycle. These results represent the number of inspections completed as a percentage of the number of inspections due. Percent of Elevator and Escalator Inspections Completed Timely Fiscal Year Total Inspections Due # Inspections Completed % Inspected Timely FY 2019 612 +2.86% 584 -2.99% 95.42% FY 2018 595 +2.23% 602 +24.38% 101.18% FY 2017 582 +16.4% 484 -13.11% 83.16% FY 2016 500 -11.97% 557 -2.62% 111.40% FY 2015 568 0% 572 +8.95% 100.0% FY 2014 568 +0.53% 525 -5.75% 93.0% FY 2013 565 0% 557 -6.07% 98.6% FY 2012 565 0% 593 +5.52% 105% FY 2011 565 -22.07% 562 +21.38% 99.5% FY 2010 725 0% 463 0% 63.9% Analysis of results and challenges: Devices in the elevator class are due for inspection every other year, and the number of inspections due reflects half of the number of active objects. The program had a full inspection staff for the duration of FY2019, and was able to exceed the inspection goal for the year. Travel costs continue to impact Mechanical Inspection’s ability to inspect every object on time.

Target #5: Inspect 90% of Boiler vessel units timely Methodology: Boiler and pressure vessels inspections are tracked through Mechanical Inspections database. These results represent the number of overdue objects as a percentage of the total number of objects statewide. Percent of Boiler Unit Inspections Completed Timely Fiscal Year Total Objects Total inspected Vessels % of Overdue Vessels FY 2019 33,136 +1.3% 29,280 +0.09% 88.37% FY 2018 32,711 +1.17% 29,255 +1.93% 89.43% FY 2017 32,332 +1.4% 28,702 +4.8% 88.77% FY 2016 31,885 +0.81% 27,388 -2.04% 85.90% FY 2015 31,628 +0.01% 27,957 -2.17% 88.40% FY 2014 31,626 +1.12% 28,578 +1.7% 90.36% FY 2013 31,275 +1.31% 28,100 +1.44% 89.85% FY 2012 30,870 +2.08% 27,702 -0.56% 89.74% FY 2011 30,241 +5.23% 27,859 +6.56% 92.12% FY 2010 28,739 0% 26,143 0% 90.97% Analysis of results and challenges: The total objects represents the total number of active objects subject to inspection statewide (state, owner/user, and insurance company inspections). In FY2019 the section fell short of maintaining the goal inspecting 90% of boilers and pressure vessels timely. Travel budget constraints and personnel turnover are the have the largest effect on section efficiency in this area.

Target #1: Maintain average wage claim resolution time to six months or less. Methodology: Days open at time of closure is maintained for every valid wage claim received by the Wage and Hour Administration Analysis of results and challenges: Wage and Hour is approaching the target of average wage claim resolution time due to increased staff. By focusing on closing older claims, the resolution time average stays above the target. This was selected by Wage and Hour as a fair and reasonable timeline to complete investigative actions on wage claims. A short turnaround time is valuable to both employees and employers Related links:    • Wage & Hour Jurisdiction

Target #2: Provide Wage and Hour briefings to employers Methodology: Wage and Hour maintains records of the number of briefings conducted for employers by Wage and Hour staff. Analysis of results and challenges: Wage and Hour currently tracks the number of employer briefings which are a strategy to reduce wage claims. Employer Briefings include seminars, on-site visits, and quick and accurate responses to employer inquiries. Alaska has a constantly changing business environment, and frequent briefings are an important employer education tool to help increase compliance with Wage and Hour. Wage and Hour continues to focus efforts on proactive measures to assist employers with understanding the legal requirements. A division-wide reorganization temporarily reduced Wage and Hour's number of employee briefings as two front-line administrative staff were reassigned to other duties. However, Wage and Hour has employed three new investigators and as they become more trained, the numbers are expected to increase.

Current as of December 6, 2019